Back to Services

VA Medical Malpractice (1151) Case

Expert Independent Medical Opinions (IMOs) for VA 1151 claims. Establish negligence and proximate cause for injuries resulting from VA medical malpractice.

What is a VA Medical Malpractice (1151) Case?

A VA 1151 Claim, governed by 38 U.S.C. § 1151, allows veterans to receive disability compensation for additional injuries, aggravated conditions, or death resulting from VA medical care, surgery, or VA-sponsored training. Unlike standard service connection, a successful 1151 claim requires proving that the VA's medical care was careless, negligent, or lacked proper skill, and that this negligence proximately caused the injury. Because these claims hinge on complex legal and medical standards, an Independent Medical Opinion (IMO) from a private physician is often the critical piece of evidence needed to establish that the VA breached the standard of care.

Overview

Claims filed under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 (commonly known as "1151 Claims") are among the most difficult VA disability cases to win. These claims allow veterans to seek compensation when they are injured, or a pre-existing condition is worsened, as a result of VA medical treatment, surgery, hospitalization, or vocational rehabilitation.

However, the VA does not grant 1151 claims simply because a bad outcome occurred. To win, you must prove medical malpractice.

*The Burden of Proof in 1151 Claims**

To succeed in a 38 U.S.C. § 1151 claim, the veteran must establish two critical medical facts:

1. **Breach of Standard of Care (Negligence):** The VA medical provider was careless, negligent, lacked proper skill, or made an error in judgment that a competent provider would not have made.

2. **Proximate Cause:** The specific negligence directly caused the new injury or worsened the existing condition.

Proving these elements requires highly specialized medical evidence. The VA will rely on its own medical examiners, who are often reluctant to testify against the agency or their colleagues.

*How Our Expert IMOs Help**

Our licensed clinicians provide the objective, expert Independent Medical Opinions (IMOs) required to counter the VA's internal assessments. We conduct a forensic review of your VA medical records to identify deviations from accepted medical standards.

When we accept a case, our documentation explicitly addresses the legal requirements of an 1151 claim:

We identify the specific standard of care that applied to your situation.
We document exactly how the VA facility or provider failed to meet that standard.
We provide a detailed medical rationale linking the provider's failure directly to your current injury or disability.
*The Difference Between 1151 Claims and FTCA Lawsuits**

It is important to note that an 1151 claim is a claim for VA disability benefits, not a lawsuit. While veterans can sometimes pursue both an 1151 claim and a lawsuit under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), our focus is entirely on providing the medical nexus evidence required for the VA benefits side of the process.

If you have suffered an unexpected injury, surgical complication, or worsened condition due to VA healthcare, professional medical advocacy is essential. Our IMOs level the playing field, providing the independent medical authority needed to hold the VA accountable through the § 1151 process.


### Related Resources

What's Included

Comprehensive review of VA and private medical records to assess negligence or fault under §1151 criteria.
Causation and timeline analysis to link the injury or worsening condition to VA medical treatment
Identification of missing or weak documentation and guidance on strengthening medical evidence.
Written Summary and Medical Opinion

Frequently Asked Questions

A VA 1151 Claim (based on 38 U.S.C. § 1151) is a type of disability claim for veterans who suffer an additional disability, or the aggravation of an existing injury, as a result of VA medical treatment, surgery, or vocational rehabilitation. It compensates veterans for injuries caused by VA medical malpractice or negligence.

You must prove that the VA provided care that was careless, negligent, lacked proper skill, or was an error in judgment, AND that this specific failure proximately caused your injury or worsened condition. You cannot win simply because a procedure was unsuccessful; you must prove the standard of care was breached.

Because 1151 claims require proving that VA doctors committed malpractice, relying solely on VA examiners is rarely successful. An IMO from a private, independent clinician provides the objective, expert medical rationale needed to establish that the VA breached the standard of care and caused your injury.

Yes, it is possible to pursue both an 1151 claim for disability benefits and a lawsuit under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) for damages. However, if you win both, the VA will offset your 1151 monthly benefits until the amount of the FTCA settlement or judgment is recouped. We focus solely on the medical evidence needed for the 1151 disability claim.

Injuries compensated under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 are treated 'as if' they were service-connected for the purposes of paying disability compensation and granting related benefits. However, they are technically considered 'Section 1151' disabilities, not direct service connection.

Related Insights

Blog

ChatGPT Nexus Letter for VA Claims: Why AI-Generated Letters Get Denied and What the VA's 2026 Fraud Tool Means for Veterans

Veterans are using ChatGPT and AI tools to generate nexus letters for VA disability claims. The advice is everywhere on Reddit and YouTube. But AI-generated letters fail the VA's competent medical evidence standard — and the VA's 2026 fraud-detection tool was built to catch exactly what these tools produce.
Read Article
Blog

Will Filing for Aid & Attendance Put My Current VA Disability Ratings at Risk?

Filing for Aid and Attendance (SMC-L) does not automatically trigger a review or reduction of your existing service-connected ratings. However, the VA may order a new Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination as part of processing the SMC claim, and the results of that examination could theoretically lead to a proposed reduction if the examiner documents improvement in a previously rated condition. Veterans with Permanent and Total (P&T) status, ratings protected under the 5-year, 10-year, or 20-year stabilization rules (38 CFR § 3.344, 38 CFR § 3.951), or ratings that are static by nature face minimal practical risk. Understanding the protections already in your file — and how to document the SMC claim correctly — is the key to filing confidently.
Read Article
Blog

What Is a 38 U.S.C. § 1151 Claim? When VA Healthcare Causes Additional Disability

A 38 U.S.C. § 1151 claim is a VA disability benefits claim that compensates veterans who suffered additional disability caused by VA hospital care, medical treatment, surgical treatment, or examination. Unlike standard service connection, it does not require a link to military service. The veteran must prove VA care caused the injury and that VA was at fault or the outcome was not reasonably foreseeable. If granted, benefits are paid as if the disability were service-connected.
Read Article
Case Study

Increased Rating for PTSD From 50% to 70% Through DBQ Strategy

A Marine Corps veteran increased his PTSD VA disability rating from 50% to 70% by aligning DBQ documentation with 38 CFR § 4.130 criteria, including occupational impairment, suicidal ideation, and corroborating lay statements.
View Case Study
Case Study

Claim Readiness Review Identifies Five Missing Elements Before Filing

An Army veteran preparing to file 10 VA disability claims used a Claim Readiness Review to identify five conditions ready for immediate filing and five requiring further development. By using an Intent-to-File strategy and evidence gap analysis, the veteran preserved effective dates while improving claim strength.
View Case Study
Case Study

VA Denied Pre-Existing Knee Condition: How We Rebuilt the Aggravation Argument

Army Veteran • VA Denied Pre-Existing Knee Condition • Aggravation Beyond Natural Progression • Asthma Service Connection
View Case Study