Attorney & Advocate Partnership Program

Board-certified physician-authored medical evidence for VA disability law firms, accredited claims agents, and veteran service organizations — nexus letters, IMOs, DBQs, rebuttals, TDIU opinions, Aid & Attendance evaluations, and 1151 reports, delivered on your timeline and defensible at the Board of Veterans’ Appeals.

What is a Attorney & Advocate Partnership Program?

Board-certified physician-authored medical evidence for VA disability law firms, accredited claims agents, and veteran service organizations — nexus letters, IMOs, DBQs, rebuttals, TDIU opinions, Aid & Attendance evaluations, and 1151 reports, delivered on your timeline and defensible at the Board of Veterans’ Appeals.

Overview

We partner with VA disability attorneys, accredited claims agents, and Veteran Service Organizations (VSOs) to provide high-quality, independent medical evidence. Our board-certified physicians write medical opinions, nexus letters, DBQs, and rebuttal reports that are legally defensible and scientifically sound, helping representatives build strong cases for their veteran clients.

While no medical opinion can guarantee a specific VA outcome, our mission is to ensure your documentation is clear, credible, and professionally prepared — giving your claim the best possible foundation for success.

What's Included

Specialty-matched board-certified physicians

Legally defensible medical opinions and rebuttals

Dedicated advocate portals and priority turnaround timelines

Frequently Asked Questions

We offer dedicated medical record screening, priority turnaround times, direct access to board-certified medical experts, and bulk invoicing for law firms and advocate groups. Contact us to learn how we can support your case pipeline with high-quality medical evidence.

Related Insights

Blog

Asthma VA Rating Explained: How DC 6602 Actually Works (And Why a Normal Breathing Test Doesn't Cap Your Rating)

The VA rates asthma under 38 CFR § 4.97, Diagnostic Code 6602, at 10%, 30%, 60%, or 100%. Every tier is written with the word "or," which means you only need to meet one criterion at each level, not all of them. That is why your prescription bottle often matters more than your spirometry printout. Daily use of an inhaled anti-inflammatory medication like Symbicort, Advair, or Flovent meets the 30% criteria on its own, even when your breathing test comes back normal. Documented prednisone bursts at least three times a year meet the 60% criteria the same way.
Read Article
Blog

1151 Claim Statute of Limitations: Is There a Deadline to File?

There is no statute of limitations on a 38 U.S.C. § 1151 claim. You can file at any time, even decades after the VA treatment that harmed you. Two other clocks still control how much you are paid and which legal options you keep. Most articles on this topic never mention them. This guide explains how the three timelines work together and why waiting costs money even when it does not cost the claim.
Read Article
Blog

MST Markers: What They Are and How a Psychologist Reads Them

MST markers are the indirect evidence the VA accepts to support a military sexual trauma claim when the event was never officially reported: records from the time, changes in a veteran's service record, and statements from people who knew. Under 38 CFR § 3.304(f)(5), a qualified clinician's written interpretation of the markers can help corroborate that the event occurred. The pattern, explained well, is the evidence.
Read Article
Case Study

How an Independent Medical Opinion Builds an Aggravation Case When Conditions Block a Recommended Treatment

In claims like these, a surviving spouse pursues a cause-of-death claim for a Vietnam veteran whose aggressive cancer was denied a service connection. An Independent Medical Opinion connects the cancer to a service-connected metabolic condition and shows how other service-connected disabilities aggravated its course by making a recommended treatment physically impossible, applying the but-for standard from Spicer v. McDonough.
View Case Study
Case Study

Increased Rating for PTSD From 50% to 70% Through DBQ Strategy

A Marine Corps veteran increased his PTSD VA disability rating from 50% to 70% by aligning DBQ documentation with 38 CFR § 4.130 criteria, including occupational impairment, suicidal ideation, and corroborating lay statements.
View Case Study
Case Study

Claim Readiness Review Identifies Five Missing Elements Before Filing

An Army veteran preparing to file 10 VA disability claims used a Claim Readiness Review to identify five conditions ready for immediate filing and five requiring further development. By using an Intent-to-File strategy and evidence gap analysis, the veteran preserved effective dates while improving claim strength.
View Case Study